4.5 Article

A novel application of simple submersible yeast-based microbial fuel cells as dissolved oxygen sensors in environmental waters

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2021.109831

关键词

Yeast-based microbial fuel cell; Dissolved oxygen; Environmental biosensor; Submersible sensor; Bioelectrochemical-based biosensor

资金

  1. Kurita Asia Research Grant [19Pid003]
  2. Kurita Water and Environment Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yeast microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were used as biosensors for in-situ monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in environmental waters, showing promising prospects for future monitoring in various areas.
In this study, yeast microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were established as biosensors for in-situ monitoring of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in environmental waters, with yeast and glucose substrates acting as biocatalyst and fuel, respectively. Diverse environmental factors, such as temperature, pH and conductivity, were considered. The sensor performance was first tested with distilled water with different DO levels ranging from 0 mg/L to 8 mg/L and an external resistance of 1000 ohm. The relationship between DO and current density was non-linear (exponential). This MFC capability was further explored under different environmental conditions (pH, temperature and conductivity), and the current density produced was within the range of 0.14-34.88 mA/m2, which increased with elevated DO concentration. The resulting regression was y = 1.3051e0.3548x, with a regression coefficient (R2) = 0.71, indicating that the MFC-based DO meter was susceptible to interference. When used in environmental water samples, DO measurements using MFC resulted in errors ranging from 6.25 % to 15.15 % when compared with commercial DO meters. The simple yeast-based MFC sensors demonstrate promising prospects for future monitoring in a variety of areas, including developing countries and remote locations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据