4.7 Article

Vanadium oxides modify the expression levels of the p21, p53, and Cdc25C proteins in human lymphocytes treated in vitro

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1536-1543

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.23150

关键词

cell cycle; human lymphocyte; p21; p53; vanadium oxides

资金

  1. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [IN229220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro assays have shown that vanadium compounds interact with biological molecules similar to protein kinases and phosphatases, leading to decreased cell proliferation in human lymphocytes. While DNA analysis did not show specific cell cycle phase delays, increased levels of the p53 protein may be responsible for this delay.
In vitro assays have demonstrated that vanadium compounds interact with biological molecules similar to protein kinases and phosphatases and have also shown that vanadium oxides decrease the proliferation of cells, including human lymphocytes; however, the mechanism, the phase in which the cell cycle is delayed and the proteins involved in this process are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of vanadium oxides (V2O3, V2O4 and V2O5) in human lymphocyte cultures (concentrations of 2, 4, 8, or 16 mu g/ml) on cellular proliferation and the levels of the p53, p21 and Cdc25C proteins. After 24 h of treatment with the different concentrations of vanadium oxides, the cell cycle phases were determined by evaluating the DNA content using flow cytometry, and the levels of the p21, p53 and Cdc25C proteins were assessed by Western blot analysis. The results revealed that the DNA content remained unchanged in every phase of the cell cycle; however, only at high concentrations did protein levels increase. Although, according to previous reports, vanadium oxides induce a delay in proliferation, DNA analysis did not show this occurring in a specific cell cycle phase. Nevertheless, the increases in p53 protein levels may cause this delay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据