4.7 Article

COVID-19 outbreak, lockdown, and air quality: fresh insights from New York City

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 30, 页码 41149-41161

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13556-8

关键词

COVID-19; Lockdown; Air pollution; NO2; CO; Environmental quality; PM2.5 concentration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outbreak of COVID-19 led to a strict lockdown in New York City, providing a unique opportunity to assess air quality. Research findings showed decreases in PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations, an increase in O-3 levels, and a significant reduction in the air quality index, impacting environmental policy-making.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected all aspects of life and poses a severe threat to human health and economic development. New York City administration enacted a strict isolation decision at the end of March 2020 to tackle the COVID-19, creating a unique opportunity to assess air quality. Therefore, we investigated the impact of the lockdown on air quality in New York City. We evaluated the air pollutants concentration, i.e., PM2.5, CO, NO2, SO2, and O-3,O- during the lockdown and compared them with pre-COVID-19. We explored the first phase of lockdown through a spatial approach, then formulated the air quality index (AQI) of each pollutant before and during the lockdown. Our findings revealed that (1) there was a significant decline in the concentration level of PM2.5 from 10.3 to 4.0 mu g/m(3) during phase one of lockdown. (2) NO2 concentrations have been decreased by up to 52% in 1st phase of lockdown. (3) O-3 concentration has been increased by 44.4%. (4) Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, and Staten Island County encountered 18.75%, 55.62%, 47.14%, and 47% diminution in AQI due to lockdown as compared to 2018, respectively. Our key findings can provide critical environmental implications for policymakers, researchers, academics, and the US government.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据