4.7 Article

Synthesis of a copper (II) metal-organic framework for photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B dye in water

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 30, 页码 40835-40843

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13571-9

关键词

Metal– organic framework; Hydrothermal method; Photocatalytic activity; Rhodamine B; Visible light

资金

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cu(II) metal-organic frameworks based on 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid were successfully synthesized by the hydrothermal method, exhibiting pyramid-shaped morphology and high specific surface area. The photocatalytic activity of Cu-3(BTC)(2) on Rhodamine B degradation under visible light irradiation was significantly enhanced, showing great potential for environmental applications in water pollution treatment. Additionally, its recyclability was confirmed through multiple cycles of testing.
The Cu(II) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) based on 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (Cu-3(BTC)(2)) was synthesized by the hydrothermal method. The synthesized Cu-3(BTC)(2) exhibited pyramid-shaped morphology and showing an average specific area of 32.16 m(2) g(-1). The Cu-3(BTC)(2) photocatalysts were characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX), UV-Vis diffusive reflectance spectra, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET). The photocatalytic activity of Cu-3(BTC)(2) was examined on Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation under visible light irradiation. The outcomes displayed exceedingly enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. In addition, its recyclability was also confirmed for multiple cycles. The easiness of construction and high photocatalytic performance of Cu-3(BTC)(2) photocatalysts can be capable in environmental applications to treat water contamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据