4.8 Article

Predicting Monthly Community-Level Domestic Radon Concentrations in the Greater Boston Area with an Ensemble Learning Model

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 7157-7166

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08792

关键词

radon; ensemble learning model

资金

  1. USEPA grant [RD-835872]
  2. NIH [T32 HL 098048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A machine learning model was developed to predict monthly radon concentrations for each ZIP Code Tabulation Area in the Greater Boston area based on short-term measurements. A two-stage ensemble-based model showed good prediction accuracy, demonstrating the potential for use in future epidemiological studies.
Inhaling radon and its progeny is associated with adverse health outcomes. However, previous studies of the health effects of residential exposure to radon in the United States were commonly based on a county-level temporally invariant radon model that was developed using measurements collected in the mid- to late 1980s. We developed a machine learning model to predict monthly radon concentrations for each ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) in the Greater Boston area based on 363,783 short-term measurements by Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc., during the period 2005-2018. A two-stage ensemble-based model was developed to predict radon concentrations for all ZCTAs and months. Stage one included 12 base statistical models that independently predicted ZCTA-level radon concentrations based on geological, architectural, socioeconomic, and meteorological factors for each ZCTA. Stage two aggregated the predictions of these 12 base models using an ensemble learning method. The results of a 10-fold cross-validation showed that the stage-two model has a good prediction accuracy with a weighted R-2 of 0.63 and root mean square error of 22.6 Bq/m(3). The community-level time-varying predictions from our model have good predictive precision and accuracy and can be used in future prospective epidemiological studies in the Greater Boston area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据