4.7 Article

Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 18-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005

关键词

Integration; Transdisciplinary Research; Learning; Co-Production of Knowledge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integration is a multidimensional interactive process in transdisciplinary research, aiming to establish connections between different thought-collectives without predetermined outcomes. It can occur at various instances during the research process, involving communication and sharing among participants.
Integration is a key process in transdisciplinary research and knowledge co-production. Nonetheless, it is often used as a buzzword without specifying what exactly it means or what actually happens during integration. We propose conceptualizing integration as a multidimensional interactive process. We characterize it as an openended learning process without pre-determined outcomes. Integration designates relations established throughout a transdisciplinary research process between elements that were not previously related. Those elements are participants in the process and their thought-styles and thought-collectives and more specifically pieces of knowledge, ideas, or practices from different thought-collectives as well as views of individual researchers and practitioners. Integration can happen at manifold instances of a transdisciplinary research process. It can take place among two, several, or all participants and can be one-sided or mutual. It might include insights, practices, frameworks, or concepts shared by two, several, or all participants. Consensus is only one along with other ways of retaining plurality of thought-styles and seeing integration as a balance between them that remains subject to continuous revision. To analyse or achieve effective integration, further dimensions beyond the cognitive have to be taken into account including at least an emotional and a social-interactional dimension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据