4.7 Article

Anthropogenic aerosols prolong fog lifetime in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abef32

关键词

fog lifetime; aerosol; global warming; process interactions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41975181]
  2. Chinese Key Projects in the National Science and Technology [2017YFC0209604, 2018YFF0300101]
  3. US Department of Energy Atmospheric System Research (ASR) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term measurements in China show that increases in aerosol levels and global warming have opposite effects on fog lifetime; aerosols primarily prolong fog lifetime by delaying fog dissipation, while warming decreases fog lifetime by delaying fog formation. The overall aerosol effect on fog lifetime in China is dominant, particularly in the highly polluted regions of Eastern China.
Investigation of aerosol effects on fog with long-term measurements has generally focused on fog occurrence frequency and intensity; here we examine the effects on fog lifetime, fog formation, and fog dissipation. From analysis of 52 years (1960-2011) of data collected at 404 stations in China, it is found that fog lifetime exhibits a clear increasing trend with time, and the increased lifetime is mainly attributable to delayed fog dissipation. Increased aerosol levels and global warming affect fog lifetime in opposite ways; increased aerosol levels serve to prolong fog lifetime by primarily delaying fog dissipation, whereas warming decreases fog lifetime by primarily delaying fog formation. The overall aerosol effect on fog lifetime in China is shown to predominate, especially in the highly polluted region of Eastern China. The observational findings are confirmed by a suite of WRF-Chem simulations that reveal the influences of both increased aerosol levels and temperatures through a complex chain of interactions among microphysical, dynamical, thermodynamic, and radiative processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据