4.7 Article

Sulfadiazine, sulfamethazine and sulfachloropyridazine removal using three different porous materials: Pine bark, oak ash and mussel shell

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110814

关键词

Sulfonamides; Batch experiments; Oak ash; Mussel shell; Pine bark; Adsorption/desorption

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of science, innovation and universities [RTI2018-099574-B-C21, RTI2018-099574-B-C22]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (FEDER in Spain)
  3. Spanish Government [FPU15/0280]
  4. Improving Coordination of Senior Staff (CAPES), Post-Doctoral Program Abroad (PDE) of the Brazilian Government [88881.172297/2018-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that pine bark is the most efficient bioadsorbent, adsorbing up to 95% of the three antibiotics, while oak ash and mussel shell have lower adsorption capacities. The adsorption data fit well with Linear and Freundlich models, with similar values for adsorption parameters across different sorbent materials.
This work focuses on studying the efficacy of three different by-products to adsorb three antibiotics (sulfadiazine, SDZ; sulfamethazine, SMT; sulfachloropyridazine, SCP). These antibiotics can be considered pollutants of the environment when they reach water, as well as in cases where they are spread on soils through irrigation or contained in sewage sludge or livestock manure. In this study, batch-type adsorption/desorption experiments were performed for each of the three sulfonamides, adding 7 different concentrations of the antibiotics, going from 1 to 50 mu mol L-1, and with contact time of 24 h. The results indicate that pine bark is the most efficient bioadsorbent among those studied, as it adsorbs up to 95% of the antibiotics added, while desorption is always less than 11%. However, for oak ash and mussel shell the adsorption is always lower than 45 and 15%, respectively, and desorption is high, reaching up to 49% from oak ash and up to 81% from mussel shell. Adsorption data showed good fitting to the Linear and Freundlich models, with R-2 values between 0.98 and 1.00 in both cases. K-d and K-F adsorption parameters showed similar values for the same sorbent materials but were much higher for pine bark than for the other two bioadsorbents. The Freundlich's n parameter showed values in the range 0.81-1.28. The highest K-F values (and therefore the highest adsorption capacities) were obtained for the antibiotic SCP in pine bark. Pine bark showed the highest capacity to adsorb each of the antibiotics, increasing as a function of the concentration added. When the concentration of sulfonamide added was 50 mu M, the amounts adsorbed were 780 mu mol kg(-1) for SDZ, 890 mu mol kg(-1) for SMT, and 870 mu mol kg(-1) for SCP. Oak ash and mussel shell have low adsorption capacity for all three sulfonamides, showing values always lower than 150 mu mol kg(-1) (oak ash) and 20 mu mol kg(-1) (mussel shell) when a concentration of 50 mu mol L-1 of antibiotic is added. The results of this study could aid to make an appropriate management of the by-products studied, in order to facilitate their valorization and recycling in the treatment of environmental compartments polluted with sulfonamide antibiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据