4.7 Review

Endocrine-disrupting effects of bisphenols on urological cancers

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110485

关键词

Endocrine disruptor; Bisphenol; Cancer; Prostate; Bladder

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [RGPIN-201505413]
  2. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)
  3. Quebec Cell, Tissue and Gene Therapy Network - TheCell - FRQS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenols are endocrine-disrupting chemicals that have been linked to cancer progression, particularly prostate cancer. They are found in the urine of the vast majority of the population and could potentially impact the normal physiology and cancer development of the bladder.
Bisphenols are endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in a broad range of products that can modulate hormonal signalling pathways and various other biological functions. These compounds can bind steroid receptors, e.g. estrogen and androgen receptors, expressed by numerous cells and tissues, including the prostate and the bladder, with the potential to alter their homeostasis and normal physiological functions. In the past years, exposure to bisphenols was linked to cancer progression and metastasis. As such, recent pieces of evidence suggest that endocrine-disrupting chemicals can lead to the development of prostate cancer. Moreover, bisphenols are found in the urine of the wide majority of the population. They could potentially affect the bladder's normal physiology and cancer development, even if the bladder is not recognized as a hormone-sensitive tissue. This review will focus on prostate and bladder malignancies, two urological cancers that share standard carcinogenic processes. The description of the underlying mechanisms involved in cell toxicity, and the possible roles of bisphenols in the development of prostate and bladder cancer, could help establish the putative roles of bisphenols on public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据