4.6 Article

Biological production of H2, CH4 and CO2 in the deep subsurface of the Iberian Pyrite Belt

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 3913-3922

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15561

关键词

-

资金

  1. MICINN [PID2019-1048126GB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study of subsurface hard-rock cores in the Iberian Pyrite Belt revealed that gases such as H-2, CH4 and CO2 in the deep subsurface have a biological origin, with possible microbial communities identified to be involved in their production. The analysis of carbon isotopic signatures further supported the biological methane production in these environments.
Most of the terrestrial deep subsurfaces are oligotrophic environments in which some gases, mainly H-2, CH4 and CO2, play an important role as energy and/or carbon sources. In this work, we assessed their biotic and abiotic origin in samples from subsurface hard-rock cores of the Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) at three different depths (414, 497 and 520 m). One set of samples was sterilized (abiotic control) and all samples were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Our results showed that H-2, CH4 and CO2 remained low and constant in the sterilized controls while their levels were 4, 4.1 and 2.5 times higher respectively, in the unsterilized samples compared to the abiotic controls. The delta C-13(CH4)-values measured in the samples (range -31.2 to -43.0 parts per thousand) reveals carbon isotopic signatures that are within the range for biological methane production. Possible microorganisms responsible for the biotic production of the gases were assessed by CARD-FISH. The analysis of sequenced genomes of detected microorganisms within the subsurface of the IPB allowed to identify possible metabolic activities involved in H-2 (Rhodoplanes, Shewanella and Desulfosporosinus), CH4 (Methanobacteriales) and CO2 production. The obtained results suggest that part of the H-2, CH4 and CO2 detected in the deep subsurface has a biological origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据