4.7 Review

How to decrease pharmaceuticals in the environment? A review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 3115-3138

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01194-y

关键词

Pharmaceutical residues; Pollution management; Pharmaceutical life cycle; Antibiotic resistance; Advanced treatment technologies

资金

  1. National Science Center [UMO- 2015/17/D/ST4/00774, UMO-2019/35/B/NZ9/00253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global issue of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment is being investigated, demanding comprehensive mitigation actions. These actions involve designing, producing, prescribing, selling, handling waste, and controlling sources of pharmaceuticals, among others, and should be ranked according to their effects in the long term.
The global problem of the presence of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment is under investigation. Despite the increase in the knowledge of its sources, fates and impacts, the assessment of risks and the derived prevention actions are limited to single cases. The predicted increasing trend in the usage of pharmaceuticals forces the various parties involved to think about comprehensive mitigation actions. There are many areas of daily human life and industrial operations where such actions should take place. Thereby, in the presented review, such actions were summarized and divided into the following groups: A. design, synthesis and production of pharmaceuticals, B. prescription, sales and waste handling, C. control of the sources with advanced technologies. As the total amount of proposed actions was found to be quite high, a ranking according to the term of effects was proposed using the pyramid of needs. The advantages of actions taken in the first steps of the pharmaceutical life cycle (acting on the upstream) over end-of-pipe actions and the application of advanced technologies (the downstream option) were discussed, with reference to expert opinions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据