4.6 Article

Unveiling Operator Growth Using Spin Correlation Functions

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23050587

关键词

operator growth; scrambling; quantum quench; quantum chaos

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-1911298]
  2. Korea Institute for Advanced Study [PG059602]
  3. Institute for Basic Science in Korea [IBS-R024-D1]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [PG059602] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a non-equilibrium dynamics induced by strongly correlated Hamiltonians with all-to-all interactions is explored through a Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK)-based quench protocol. It is shown that the time evolution of simple spin-spin correlation functions is sensitive to the degree of k-locality of the corresponding operators, providing a tool to distinguish between operator-hopping and operator growth dynamics, which are indicative of quantum chaos in many-body quantum systems. This observation could be utilized as a promising method to probe chaotic behavior in advanced quench setups.
In this paper, we study non-equilibrium dynamics induced by a sudden quench of strongly correlated Hamiltonians with all-to-all interactions. By relying on a Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK)-based quench protocol, we show that the time evolution of simple spin-spin correlation functions is highly sensitive to the degree of k-locality of the corresponding operators, once an appropriate set of fundamental fields is identified. By tracking the time-evolution of specific spin-spin correlation functions and their decay, we argue that it is possible to distinguish between operator-hopping and operator growth dynamics; the latter being a hallmark of quantum chaos in many-body quantum systems. Such an observation, in turn, could constitute a promising tool to probe the emergence of chaotic behavior, rather accessible in state-of-the-art quench setups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据