4.6 Article

Hyperchaotic Image Encryption Based on Multiple Bit Permutation and Diffusion

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23050510

关键词

hyperchaotic; image encryption; permutation; diffusion; multiple bit operation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project [19YJAZH047]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department [17ZB0433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel hyperchaotic image encryption scheme MBPD, which enhances image security through multiple bit permutation and diffusion. Extensive experiments show that MBPD can effectively resist different types of attacks and outperforms other popular encryption methods.
Image security is a hot topic in the era of Internet and big data. Hyperchaotic image encryption, which can effectively prevent unauthorized users from accessing image content, has become more and more popular in the community of image security. In general, such approaches conduct encryption on pixel-level, bit-level, DNA-level data or their combinations, lacking diversity of processed data levels and limiting security. This paper proposes a novel hyperchaotic image encryption scheme via multiple bit permutation and diffusion, namely MBPD, to cope with this issue. Specifically, a four-dimensional hyperchaotic system with three positive Lyapunov exponents is firstly proposed. Second, a hyperchaotic sequence is generated from the proposed hyperchaotic system for consequent encryption operations. Third, multiple bit permutation and diffusion (permutation and/or diffusion can be conducted with 1-8 or more bits) determined by the hyperchaotic sequence is designed. Finally, the proposed MBPD is applied to image encryption. We conduct extensive experiments on a couple of public test images to validate the proposed MBPD. The results verify that the MBPD can effectively resist different types of attacks and has better performance than the compared popular encryption methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据