4.7 Review

Review of analytical studies on seismic fluid-structure interaction of base-supported cylindrical tanks

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111589

关键词

Seismic fluid-structure interaction; Base-supported cylindrical tanks; Impulsive and convective responses; Verification of numerical models

资金

  1. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPAE) , U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AR0000978]
  2. TerraPower, Bellevue, WA
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [CRADA 14CR04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper reviews the analytical solutions for seismic fluid-structure interaction (FSI) of tanks, developed since the 1930s, and discusses the impulsive and convective components of the FSI response. It compares responses for different tank dimensions and input motions, emphasizing the importance of considering tank flexibility in seismic analysis and the limitations of approximate solutions in modern times.
Analytical solutions for seismic fluid-structure interaction (FSI) of tanks are used by analysts and engineers for a number of purposes, including preliminary sizing, risk assessment, and verification of numerical models. Analytical solutions for seismic FSI of tanks were first developed in the 1930s and have been extended and/or modified in the following nine decades to accommodate different seismic inputs and boundary conditions. This paper reviews published analytical solutions for rigid and flexible, base-supported, cylindrical tanks subjected to unidirectional horizontal motion of a small amplitude. The studies parsed the fluid-structure (FSI) response into an impulsive and a convective component, and addressed frequencies of lateral motions of the tank (i.e., impulsive frequencies), hydrodynamic pressures, frequencies of waves (i.e., convective frequencies), wave heights, and reactions at the base. The solutions were categorized into exact and approximate solutions based on the methodologies used. Herein, FSI responses are calculated and compared for a range of tank dimensions using the analytical solutions from the different studies. The responses presented here are normalized to be unitless, and can be used for tanks with different dimensions and mechanical properties, and subjected to different input motions. A sample steel water tank is analyzed using the normalized solutions for two earthquake ground mo-tions with different frequency contents. Ignoring tank flexibility may significantly underestimate seismic re-sponses of the tank and its contained fluid. The approximate solutions, which have been widely used for decades, may not be sufficiently accurate in the modern era. Calculation errors in the reviewed studies are identified and corrected, and differences are quantified for the sample tank.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据