4.7 Article

Fracture surface analysis and quantitative characterization of gallium arsenide III-V semiconductors using fractography

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105313

关键词

Fractography; Failure analysis; Single crystal; Gallium arsenide; Mirror constant; Crystal hackle; Stereography

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant [RGPIN-2015-04185]
  2. MITACS Globalink Grant (Canada) [IT09006]
  3. ETS Fonds pour la collaboration internationale de recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is widely used in demanding semiconductor applications, but the fracture mechanisms are not well understood. A quantitative approach and detailed analysis help identify main fractographic features and estimate fracture constants. The fractographic features of GaAs correspond to the intrinsic symmetries of single-crystal GaAs.
Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is used in the most demanding semiconductor applications, including in the medical, aerospace and communication industries, where significant mechanical stresses are experienced during operation. Mechanical stresses from thermal expansion and mechanical loading can result in the fracture of GaAs crystals, a leading cause of semiconductor device failure. Unfortunately, the underlying fracture mechanisms in GaAs III-V semiconductors are currently not well understood. In this manuscript, we present a quantitative approach to identify the main GaAs fractographic features and correlate these to a crystal's original mechanical fracture strength. In addition, detailed fractographic analysis was used to estimate the crystal hackle constant (analogous to the mirror constant in isotropic media), AXH({110})(< 221 >) = 1.58 MPa root m on the {110} cleavage planes of GaAs. Finally, crystal stereography and analytical geometry was used to confirm that the fractographic features correspond to the intrinsic symmetries of single-crystal GaAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据