4.7 Article

Intensified alternative to purify methyl-Ethyl ketone in a framework of green process

期刊

ENERGY
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119641

关键词

Methyl-Ethyl Ketone; Multi-objective optimization; Downstream process; Individual risk; Controllability

资金

  1. CONACYT
  2. Universidad de Guanajuato
  3. SEP [UGTO-PTC-668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MEK is a promising bulk chemical with numerous applications, but its purification process faces challenges due to the formation of azeotropes. Therefore, a intensified process has been proposed to reduce the energy investment for MEK purification and replace traditional distillation methods. Comparison results showed that the intensified design performed excellently in terms of energy investment.
Methyl-Ethyl Ketone (MEK) is a promising bulk chemical due to its several applications. MEK can be produced by hydrogenation of 2, 3-Butanediol, a chemical previously produced by fermentation. As hydrogenation results, the output is composed of water, isobutyraldehyde, 2, 3-Butanediol, and Methyl ethyl ketone. Because of the thermodynamic interactions, two azeotropes are formed; consequently, the purification of that mixture is challenging. Current needs promote the generation of alternatives with good economic and environmental performance, however, inherent safety and good controllability must also be accomplished. In this study an intensified process is proposed to reduce the energy investment for MEK purification. The alternative is a hybrid process that combines the advantages of using a liquid-liquid extraction column for handling the azeotropes aforementioned. Additionally, this proposal is compared with four alternatives previously proposed based only on distillation. All alternatives were modeled in Aspen Plus and were optimized considering four targets, the total annual cost, the eco-indicator 99, the individual risk, and the condition number as economic, environmental, safety and controllability indexes, respectively. As a result, interesting trends among objectives and design variables were found. Additionally, the intensified design reported an energy investment of 6.78 MJfuel/kg(MEK), and the best pure distillation alternative 35.5 MJ(fuel)/Kg(MEK). (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据