4.7 Article

A global wind farm potential index to increase energy yields and accessibility

期刊

ENERGY
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120923

关键词

Power grid; Wind power; Wind resource assessment; Geographic information system; Geographical restrictions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to create a globally applicable wind farm potential index to identify productive and accessible wind farm sites around the world. The index was developed using high resolution wind speed models and comprehensive land use data, integrating 16 geographical restrictions including access to power grids.
The preconditions for wind farm installation and operation are high energy yields and accessibility. However, so far, no attempts were made to develop a global scale index integrating energy yields and accessibility of wind farms. Thus, the goal of this study was to create a universally applicable wind farm potential index that enables finding productive and accessible wind farm sites around the world. The wind farm potential index was developed at a very high horizontal resolution (2000 m x 2000 m) using the Global Wind Speed Model and comprehensive land use data. The wind farm capacity factor's global pattern was estimated based on Kappa and Wakeby distributions, and a generic 3.3 MW wind turbine power curve yielding the resource potential index. The geographical potential index integrates 16 geographical restrictions, including the accessibility to the power grid. The correlation coefficients be-tween the resource potential index and geographical potential index were below 0.10 in many countries (61%). The areas with high resource potential and geographical potential were often divergent, e.g., in areas with poorly developed infrastructure. Applying the new wind farm potential index allows a global, consistent assessment of areas suitable for installing and operating wind farms. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据