4.7 Article

Towards a Zero Waste city- an analysis from the perspective of energy recovery and landfill reduction in Beijing

期刊

ENERGY
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120055

关键词

Waste to energy; Methane fermentation; Incineration; Cost-benefit analysis; Urban governance

资金

  1. Hebei Normal University Fund, China [S2020B028]
  2. Ministry of Education Foundation of China, China [20YJCZH255]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China,China [41801149, 41701636, 71690241, 72088101, 71810107001]
  4. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of Japan, Japan [31905, 11801]
  5. JSPS KAKENHI Grant, Japan [19K2353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes four different scenarios for Municipal Solid Waste treatment in Beijing, with scenario 4 (MBT system) ranking highest in reducing landfill amount, improving energy recovery efficiency, and reducing GHG emissions. Scenario 3 achieves the highest economic benefit. The continuous implementation of waste separation policy and waste-to-energy options in China are critical for establishing an efficient waste management system.
Waste management has been one of the urgent environmental issues due to the rapid urbanization in China. There is a huge potential to improve the energy recovery efficiency of the current waste treatment system. This study aims to propose an efficient waste management system to reduce the landfill amount and improve the energy recovery rate (ERE) of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) treatment by considering environment, energy, economic, and policy effects. This study selects Beijing as a case study city and proposes four different MSW treatment scenarios. The landfill reduction amount, energy recovery efficiency, life cycle costs and benefits, and the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions are evaluated. Furthermore, the impact of waste separation policy on the landfill amount, and the proposed internal rate of return (IRR) index are also quantified. The results show that the proposed scenarios can significantly reduce the amount of landfill. Scenario 4 (MBT system) ranks the highest, with a value of 92.69%. From the energy recovery and GHG emissions reduction perspectives, scenario 4 can achieve the highest energy recovery efficiency (65.33%) and the highest GHG emissions reduction (2.09 x 10(6) tons CO(2)e). From the economic perspective, scenario 3 can achieve the highest benefit with a value of 6.00 x 10(9) CNY. Such benefits are highly affected by the factors of the treatment capacity, the tipping fee and the power generation efficiency. With the continuous implementation of waste separation policy and waste-to-energy option in China, it is critical to assess the related environmental and economic benefits so that an efficient waste management system can be established. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据