4.5 Article

Uncontrolled Electric Vehicle Charging Impacts on Distribution Electric Power Systems with Primarily Residential, Commercial or Industrial Loads

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14061688

关键词

electric vehicle; charging; integration; grid impacts; distribution; profile

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study simulated the impact of EV charging on distribution electric power systems, showing modest voltage impacts but a noticeable increase in line loading of about 15%. Different types of feeders experience slight shifts in peak load times.
An increase in Electric Vehicles (EV) will result in higher demands on the distribution electric power systems (EPS) which may result in thermal line overloading and low voltage violations. To understand the impact, this work simulates two EV charging scenarios (home- and work-dominant) under potential 2030 EV adoption levels on 10 actual distribution feeders that support residential, commercial, and industrial loads. The simulations include actual driving patterns of existing (non-EV) vehicles taken from global positioning system (GPS) data. The GPS driving behaviors, which explain the spatial and temporal EV charging demands, provide information on each vehicles travel distance, dwell locations, and dwell durations. Then, the EPS simulations incorporate the EV charging demands to calculate the power flow across the feeder. Simulation results show that voltage impacts are modest (less than 0.01 p.u.), likely due to robust feeder designs and the models only represent the high-voltage (primary) system components. Line loading impacts are more noticeable, with a maximum increase of about 15%. Additionally, the feeder peak load times experience a slight shift for residential and mixed feeders (approximate to 1 h), not at all for the industrial, and 8 h for the commercial feeder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据