4.5 Article

Model Predictive Control with Adaptive Building Model for Heating Using the Hybrid Air-Conditioning System in a Railway Station

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14071996

关键词

model predictive control (MPC); railway passenger station; radiant floor heating; hybrid air conditioning system; RC model

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0705000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an adaptive building model-based model predictive control (MPC) system to address the heating control challenges of a railway station on the Tibetan Plateau. Results show that the adaptive MPC improves indoor thermal comfort, reduces energy consumption by 22.2% compared to PID control, and achieves 11.5% energy savings compared to MPC without adaptive model.
A model predictive control (MPC) system with an adaptive building model based on thermal-electrical analogy for the hybrid air conditioning system using the radiant floor and all-air system for heating is proposed in this paper to solve the heating supply control difficulties of the railway station on Tibetan Plateau. The MPC controller applies an off-line method of updating the building model to improve the accuracy of predicting indoor conditions. The control performance of the adaptive MPC is compared with the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, as well as an MPC without adaptive model through simulation constructed based on a TRNSYS-MATLAB co-simulation testbed. The results show that the implementation of the adaptive MPC can improve indoor thermal comfort and reduce 22.2% energy consumption compared to the PID control. Compared to the MPC without adaptive model, the adaptive MPC achieves fewer violations of constraints and reduces energy consumption by 11.5% through periodic model updating. This study focuses on the design of a control system to maintain indoor thermal comfort and improve system efficiency. The proposed method could also be applied in other public buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据