4.5 Article

Batch Anaerobic Co-Digestion and Biochemical Methane Potential Analysis of Goat Manure and Food Waste

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14071952

关键词

anaerobic digestion; waste management; kinetic modeling; biomethane; animal manure; food waste

资金

  1. USDA-CBG program [2018-38821-27750]
  2. NSF CREST Center for Energy and Environmental Sustainability (CEES) at Prairie View A&M University (NSF), Prairie View, Texas [1036593]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improper management of concentrated goat feeding operations in the US can lead to greenhouse gas emissions and water pollution. Co-digestion of 60% goat manure was found to achieve the highest biomethane yields in the study.
The improper management of goat manure from concentrated goat feeding operations and food waste leads to the emission of greenhouse gasses and water pollution in the US. The wastes were collected from the International Goat Research Center and a dining facility at Prairie View A&M University. The biochemical methane potential of these two substrates in mono and co-digestion at varied proportions was determined in triplicates and processes were evaluated using two nonlinear regression models. The experiments were conducted at 36 +/- 1 degrees C with an inoculum to substrate ratio of 2.0. The biomethane was measured by water displacement method (pH 10:30), absorbing carbon dioxide. The cumulative yields in goat manure and food waste mono-digestions were 169.7 and 206.0 mL/gVS, respectively. Among co-digestion, 60% goat manure achieved the highest biomethane yields of 380.5 mL/gVS. The biodegradabilities of 33.5 and 65.7% were observed in goat manure and food waste mono-digestions, while 97.4% were observed in the co-digestion having 60% goat manure. The modified Gompertz model is an excellent fit in simulating the anaerobic digestion of food waste and goat manure substrates. These findings provide useful insights into the co-digestion of these substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据