4.5 Article

Co-Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignocellulosic Biomass in Supercritical Water

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14061708

关键词

lignocellulosic biomass; HTL; co-liquefaction; bio-crude

资金

  1. European Union Commission, 4REFINERY Project [727531]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated co-hydrothermal liquefaction of similar lignocellulosic biomasses in supercritical water, which resulted in lower bio-crude and higher solid yields compared to individual feedstock liquefaction. However, higher carbon recovery and higher HHVs were observed in co-liquefaction-derived bio-crudes, indicating slightly improved bio-crude quality with a significant reduction in bio-crude energy recovery.
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is an effective technology for bio-crude production. To date, various co-liquefaction studies were performed with contrasted (different composition) biomasses in subcritical water. Therefore, the present study investigated co-hydrothermal liquefaction of similar kinds of lignocellulosic biomasses (wheat straw, eucalyptus, and pinewood) in supercritical water under equal ratios at 400 degrees C with catalytic medium (K2CO3). The lower bio-crude and higher solid yields were obtained in co-liquefaction experiments, as compared to liquefaction of individual feedstocks. On the other hand, higher carbon recovery and higher HHVs were noticed in co-liquefaction-derived bio-crudes. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) results showed that organic compounds were detected in all bio-crudes in the order of phenol derivatives > ketones/aldehydes > aromatics > carboxylic acids/esters. The aqueous phase from all samples contained higher TOC in the range of 19 to 33 g/L, with alkaline pH. In short, the co-liquefaction slightly improved the bio-crude quality with a significant reduction in bio-crude energy recovery. This reflects that co-liquefaction of lignocellulosic feedstock is not favorable for enhancing bio-crude yield and improving the overall process economics of HTL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据