4.5 Article

Classification of Flow Modes for Natural Convection in a Square Enclosure with an Eccentric Circular Cylinder

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14102788

关键词

map of flow structures; inner cylinder; enclosure; natural convection

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A2C1009081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates natural convection for a hot circular cylinder in a cold square enclosure through numerical simulations. Different flow structures are classified based on the position of the cylinder, with four modes observed at Rayleigh numbers of 10^3 and 10^4, and six modes at a Rayleigh number of 10^5. The emergence of new modes at a higher Rayleigh number is characterized by top side secondary vortices and explained through corresponding isotherms.
The present study investigated the natural convection for a hot circular cylinder embedded in a cold square enclosure. The numerical simulations are performed to solve a two-dimensional steady natural convection for three Rayleigh numbers of 10(3), 10(4) and 10(5) at a fixed Prandtl number of 0.7. This study considered the wide range of the inner cylinder positions to identify the eccentric effect of the cylinder on flow and thermal structures. The present study classifies the flow structures according to the cylinder position. Finally, the present study provides the map for the flow structures at each Rayleigh number (Ra). The Ra = 10(3) and 10(4) form the four modes of the flow structures. These modes are classified by mainly the large circulation and inner vortices. When Ra = 10(5), one mode that existed at Ra = 10(3) and 10(4), disappears in the map of the flow structures. The new three modes appear, resulting in total six modes of flow structures at Ra = 10(5). New modes at Ra = 10(5) are characterized by the top side secondary vortices. The corresponding isotherms are presented to explain the bifurcation of the flow structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据