4.6 Review

Hormone Therapy in Menopause: Concepts, Controversies, and Approach to Treatment

期刊

ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 720-752

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnab011

关键词

menopause; hormone therapy; timing hypothesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hormone therapy is an effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, especially for younger women close to menopause. The benefits and risks of hormone therapy differ based on age and clinical characteristics, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches. It is crucial to consider factors such as timing of initiation, type and route of administration, and patient-specific considerations when prescribing hormone therapy.
Hormone therapy (HT) is an effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, including vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Randomized trials also demonstrate positive effects on bone health, and age-stratified analyses indicate more favorable effects on coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in younger women (close proximity to menopause) than in women more than a decade past menopause. In the absence of contraindications or other major comorbidities, recently menopausal women with moderate or severe symptoms are appropriate candidates for HT. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trials-estrogen and progestin trial and the estrogen-alone trial-clarified the benefits and risks of HT, including how the results differed by age. A key lesson from the WHI trials, which was unfortunately lost in the posttrial cacophony, was that the risk:benefit ratio and safety profile of HT differed markedly by clinical characteristics of the participants, especially age, time since menopause, and comorbidity status. In the present review of the WHI and other recent HT trials, we aim to provide readers with an improved understanding of the importance of the timing of HT initiation, type and route of administration, and of patient-specific considerations that should be weighed when prescribing HT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据