4.8 Review

Tumor cell heterogeneity and its transcriptional bases in pancreatic cancer: a tale of two cell types and their many variants

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2020107206

关键词

differentiation; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; transcription; tumor grading

资金

  1. AIRC (Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro) [20251]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2016-02361721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PDAC is a highly lethal tumor characterized by the heterogeneity of tumor cells, mainly attributed to two main classes of cells - those capable of differentiation towards endodermal, mucin-producing epithelia, and those unable to form glandular structures and instead exhibiting squamous differentiation.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), one of the most highly lethal tumors, is characterized by complex histology, with a massive fibrotic stroma in which both pseudo-glandular structures and compact nests of abnormally differentiated tumor cells are embedded, in different proportions and with different mutual relationships in space. This complexity and the heterogeneity of the tumor component have hindered the development of a broadly accepted, clinically actionable classification of PDACs, either on a morphological or a molecular basis. Here, we discuss evidence suggesting that such heterogeneity can to a large extent, albeit not exclusively, be traced back to two main classes of PDAC cells that commonly coexist in the same tumor: cells that maintained their ability to differentiate toward endodermal, mucin-producing epithelia and epithelial cells unable to form glandular structures and instead characterized by various levels of squamous differentiation and the expression of mesenchymal lineage genes. The underlying gene regulatory networks and how they are controlled by distinct transcription factors, as well as the practical implications of these two different populations of tumor cells, are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据