4.6 Article

Transport of secondary carriers in a solid lithium-ion conductor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138563

关键词

multi-ion transport; oxide garnet solid electrolyte; superionic conductor; solid-state lithium battery; dopants

资金

  1. Faraday Institution, within the SOLBAT challenge [EP/S003053/1.FIRG007]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P003532/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P003532/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an irreversible thermodynamics-based chemomechanical transport model was developed to study elastic-solid ionic conductors containing two mobile ions. Experimental results showed that secondary carriers naturally segregate and accumulate in a thin boundary layer near the cathode when their global concentration is low.
Inorganic-solid lithium electrolytes are typically thought of as single-ion conductors, but the presence of secondary carriers can strongly affect their performance. Conventional descriptions of multi-carrier transport neglect both interactions between mobile species and stress diffusion - phenomena which can markedly impact the electrical response. We apply irreversible thermodynamics to develop a chemomechanical transport model for elastic-solid ionic conductors containing two mobile ions. We simulate lithium-ion conducting Li5La3Nb2O12 (LLNO) garnet oxide, a material within which experiments have shown that mobile protons can be freely substituted for lithium to form Li5(1-y)H5yLa3Nb2O12. When subjected to a current, we find that proton-substituted LLNO exhibits bulk lithium polarization, whose extent is partially controlled by cation/cation interactions. Secondary carriers segregate naturally if their global concentration is low, accumulating in a thin boundary layer near the cathode. We quantify the limiting current and Sand's time, and analyze experimental data to show how competitive proton transport affects LLNO performance. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据