4.7 Article

Post-burning responses by vegetation on blanket bog peatland sites on a Scottish grouse moor

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107336

关键词

Grouse moor; Blanket peat; Burning; Sphagnum; Remote sensing

资金

  1. Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies show that prescribed burning of ericaceous vegetation on moorland in the UK can increase Sphagnum cover and reduce heather cover, leading to benefits such as higher peat depth. This management approach helps to reduce peatland degradation and wildfire risk, while promoting vegetation succession towards a healthier ecosystem.
Burning of ericaceous vegetation on moorland in the United Kingdom is a routine part of management for red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica) but its contribution to peatland degradation and loss of key ecosystem services is widely debated. Studies in the North Pennines, northern England, have shown that regular fires at approximately ten-year intervals can benefit Sphagnum mosses and cotton grass (Eriophorum) cover at the expense of ling heather (Calluna vulgaris). We repeated an assessment from a Pennine study of post-burning vegetation succession at a moor in south-west Scotland also managed for grouse. Here, GPS-mapped fires from 2009 to 14 were visited in 2019 to measure the vegetation response and compare it with unburned control plots. Heather cover, vegetation height and biomass increased linearly over time since burning, whereas cotton grass decreased during the first eight years. Sphagnum cover in plots burnt eight to ten years earlier averaged five times higher than that in the no-burn control plots and was positively correlated with peat depth. These results support earlier studies in northern England, showing that prescribed burning at regular intervals can increase Sphagnum cover by reducing heather cover and canopy vegetation biomass. We discuss the repercussions of this for management of blanket peat habitat, including reducing wildfire risk across UK moorlands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据