The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review

Faced with a growing sense of urgency to combat climate change, environmental policy is increasingly turning to alternative policy instruments. One method for boosting green behaviour among individuals rooted in applied behavioural economics is loss framing -transforming existing messages so that they emphasise the potential negative consequences of an action or inaction on the environment. This paper provides a systematic review of the existing body of evidence on framing effects in pro-environmental decisions. Based on an analysis of 61 studies captured in 47 distinct papers we find that real behaviour has been largely neglected as an outcome variable, with preference in the literature given to the measurement of self-reporting constructs such as attitudes, willingness to pay and behavioural intentions. In support of the loss aversion hypothesis, loss framing was found to be more or equally effective in all studies examining behaviour and intentions, though gain framing was more successful where the choices taken required lower commitment, namely attitudes. We provide an analysis of other loss framing success factors and draw policy-and research implications.

Automated summary

Facing the urgency of addressing climate change, environmental policy is turning to alternative instruments, such as loss framing rooted in applied behavioral economics to promote green behavior. A review of 61 studies revealed that loss framing was equally or more effective in influencing behavior and intentions compared to gain framing, particularly in low-commitment choices like attitudes. However, the literature shows a lack of focus on real behavior outcomes, highlighting the need for further research in this area.