4.6 Article

Seismic structural health monitoring using the modal assurance distribution

期刊

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 2379-2397

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3451

关键词

clustering; damage identification; nonlinear normal mode; nonlinear structure; time‐ frequency representation; time‐ varying feature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new method for short-term nonstationary vibrational structural responses, which investigates the structural behavior during earthquakes through the identification of instantaneous modal parameters to obtain accurate damage assessment information. The results of two case studies demonstrate the potential and applicability of the proposed method for the integrity assessment of civil structures.
Thanks to emerging techniques in the field of signal processing and due to improvements in smart sensing systems which enable the event-triggered acquisition of high-fidelity data at the occurrence of strong ground motion events, seismic structural health monitoring has grown considerably in the last few decades. In this paper, the modal assurance distribution, an alternative time-frequency representation of the modal features of multivariate and multicomponent signals, is extended for application to short-term nonstationary vibrational structural responses in which the system may manifest its nonlinear behavior. A general procedure for the extraction of the decoupled normal modes is presented, which allows the identification of instantaneous modal parameters in order to investigate in detail the structural behavior during earthquakes. Valuable information that cannot be recovered by means of traditional criteria can thus be exploited for accurate damage assessment. The results obtained for two case studies consisting of a numerical model with softening nonlinear behavior and a full-scale experimental reinforced concrete benchmark show the potential and applicability of the method proposed for the integrity assessment of civil structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据