4.4 Review

Recent developments in in vitro and in vivo models for improved translation of preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 207-233

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2021.1922435

关键词

Clearance prediction; zebrafish; in-vitro in-vivo extrapolation; intrinsic clearance; in-vivo models

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R00-ES029552]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-01153, 2016-01154, 2019-01837]
  3. Strategic Research Programmes in Diabetes (SFO Diabetes)
  4. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine (StratRegen)
  5. EU/EFPIA/OICR/McGill/KTH/Diamond Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (EUbOPEN) [875510]
  6. Merck KGaA
  7. Eli Lilly and Company
  8. American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education Predoctoral Fellowship
  9. NIGMS [R25 GM56847]
  10. Louis Zeh Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) prediction in the early stages of drug development is crucial for informing lead optimization strategies and reducing attrition rates. Recent advancements in the development of new in vitro and in vivo strategies have enabled better characterization of pharmacokinetic properties and efficacy of drug leads.
Improved pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) prediction in the early stages of drug development is essential to inform lead optimization strategies and reduce attrition rates. Recently, there have been significant advancements in the development of new in vitro and in vivo strategies to better characterize pharmacokinetic properties and efficacy of drug leads. Herein, we review advances in experimental and mathematical models for clearance predictions, advancements in developing novel tools to capture slowly metabolized drugs, in vivo model developments to capture human etiology for supporting drug development, limitations and gaps in these efforts, and a perspective on the future in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据