4.7 Editorial Material

Revamping the ever-changing landscape of drug development processes in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1337-1339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.04.024

关键词

Oncology drug class; Cancer indication; Molecularly targeted; Drug Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oncology is at the forefront of drug development, with a significant focus on molecularly targeted drugs in recent years. FDA approvals for novel oncology drugs from 2017 to 2020 span across diverse classes, signaling substantial progress in cancer treatment despite the limited potential for complete cure.
Oncology is the frontline of drug development. The current pharmaceutical pipeline is disproportional focused on oncology, where about 1/3 of all phases of development is in this therapeutic area. The emphasis brings about substantial breakthroughs and has made positive impact on the quality of life. However, oncology remains a threat to human existence. To facilitate this process, a comprehensive list of novel/first molecularly targeted oncology drug approvals by the FDA from 2017 to 2020 is assessed. Here, we focus on molecularly targeted oncology drugs and not cytotoxic ones, although the latter remain important. To achieve this purpose, besides their sponsors, years of approval, drug classes, and cancer indications, clinical significance is included. The results show that approved molecularly targeted drugs span across diverse classes, including small molecule receptor inhibitors, and biologics such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, check-point inhibitors (i.e., PD1, PDL1, CTLA4) and CAR-T cell therapies. Although complete cure of cancer remains limited, we have made substantial inroads and more is yet to come. Moreover, many of these new knowledge can be extrapolated to other therapeutic areas, especially to those of currently unmet medical needs such as in and other chronic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据