4.4 Article

Gene expression patterns associated with dental replacement in the rabbit, a new model for the mammalian dental replacement mechanisms

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 250, 期 10, 页码 1494-1504

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.335

关键词

deciduous tooth; diphyodonty; odontogenesis; permanent dentition; rabbit; tooth germ; tooth replacement

资金

  1. IGFL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the European rabbit as a model for mammalian tooth development and replacement, providing data on key regulators of tooth development. The presence of LEF1(+) cells and absence of mesenchymal RUNX2 and epithelial Sostdc1(+) cells correlate with the initiation and maintenance of tooth replacement.
Background Unlike many vertebrates with continuous dental replacement, mammals have a maximum of two dental generations. Due to the absence of dental replacement in the laboratory mouse, the mechanisms of the mammalian tooth replacement system are poorly known. In this study, we use the European rabbit as a model for mammalian tooth development and replacement. Results We provide data on some key regulators of tooth development. We detected the presence of SOX2 in both the replacement dental lamina and the rudimentary successional dental lamina of unreplaced molars, indicating that SOX2 may not be sufficient to initiate and maintain tooth replacement. We showed that Shh does not seem to be directly involved in tooth replacement. The transient presence of the rudimentary successional dental lamina in the molar allowed us to identify genes that could be essential for the initiation or the maintenance of tooth replacement. Hence, the locations of Sostdc1, RUNX2, and LEF1 vary between the deciduous premolar, the replacement premolar, and the molar, indicating possible roles in tooth replacement. Conclusion According to our observations, initiation and the maintenance of tooth replacement correlate with the presence of LEF1(+) cells and the absence of both mesenchymal RUNX2 and epithelial Sostdc1(+) cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据