4.6 Review

Sensing and signalling viral infection in drosophila

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103985

关键词

NF-kappa B; STING; RNA interference; Innate immunity; Antiviral factors; Virus

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Investissements d'avenir program [ANR-10-LABX-0036, ANR-11-EQPX-0022]
  3. ANR [ANR-17-CE15-0014]
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement superieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation
  5. Institut Universitaire de France
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-LABX-0036, ANR-11-EQPX-0022] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster is a valuable model for studying innate immune mechanisms, especially in the context of viral infections. Research has uncovered the importance of RNA interference and inducible transcriptional responses in antiviral immunity in fruitflies. Recent discoveries of signaling pathways in fruitflies, such as the STING-IKK beta-Relish cassette, highlight the role of NF-kappa B transcription factors in controlling viral infections, in addition to bacterial and fungal infections.
The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster is a valuable model to unravel mechanisms of innate immunity, in particular in the context of viral infections. RNA interference, and more specifically the small interfering RNA pathway, is a major component of antiviral immunity in drosophila. In addition, the contribution of inducible transcriptional responses to the control of viruses in drosophila and other invertebrates is increasingly recognized. In particular, the recent discovery of a STING-IKK beta-Relish signalling cassette in drosophila has confirmed that NF-kappa B transcription factors play an important role in the control of viral infections, in addition to bacterial and fungal infections. Here, we review recent developments in the field, which begin to shed light on the mechanisms involved in sensing of viral infections and in signalling leading to production of antiviral effectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据