4.7 Article

Testicular germ cell tumors arise in the absence of sex-specific differentiation

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 148, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.197111

关键词

TGCTs; Teratomas; Germ cells; Nanos2; MYC; NODAL

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP150081]
  2. National Institutes of Health [U54DA049098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NANOS2 plays a crucial role in coordinating the differentiation of germ cells, and its absence may increase susceptibility to tumors. Developmental phenotypes necessary for tumorigenesis typically occur in germ cells failing to express NANOS2.
In response to signals from the embryonic testis, the germ cell intrinsic factor NANOS2 coordinates a transcriptional program necessary for the differentiation of pluripotent-like primordial germ cells toward a unipotent spermatogonial stem cell fate. Emerging evidence indicates that genetic risk factors contribute to testicular germ cell tumor initiation by disrupting sex-specific differentiation. Here, using the 129.MOLF-Chr19 mouse model of testicular teratomas and a NANOS2 reporter allele, we report that the developmental phenotypes required for tumorigenesis, including failure to enter mitotic arrest, retention of pluripotency and delayed sex-specific differentiation, were exclusive to a subpopulation of germ cells failing to express NANOS2. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that embryonic day 15.5 NANOS2-deficient germ cells and embryonal carcinoma cells developed a transcriptional profile enriched for MYC signaling, NODAL signaling and primed pluripotency. Moreover, lineage-tracing experiments demonstrated that embryonal carcinoma cells arose exclusively from germ cells failing to express NANOS2. Our results indicate that NANOS2 is the nexus through which several genetic risk factors influence tumor susceptibility. We propose that, in the absence of sex specification, signals native to the developing testis drive germ cell transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据