4.7 Article

Application of salinity thresholds in Spanish brine discharge regulations: Energetic and environmental implications

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 501, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114901

关键词

Brine discharge management; Salinity thresholds; Seagrasses; Environmental impact statements; Reverse osmosis

资金

  1. Mancomunidad de Canales del Taibilla

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the application of salinity thresholds in Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) in Spanish desalination plants. It found that earlier thresholds were lower than scientific recommendations, leading to increased energy consumption and dilution ratios. The paper recommends unifying thresholds based on the best available scientific evidence to reduce energy-economic costs.
This paper reviews the application of salinity thresholds in the Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) in Spanish desalination plants. Lower salinity thresholds than those recommended by the scientific community for the protection of the Posidonia oceanica meadows were established in the EIS in 2005, whereas after this year thresholds more consistent with scientific recommendations were established. In addition, as a case study, the energy consumption of these lower thresholds was analyzed using the brine discharge of the Alicante desalination plants. The threshold of 38.3 psu was easily exceeded, which resulted in increased dilution ratio and higher energy consumption. The cost of the dilution was more than 600,000 kwh and _50,000 for a six-month period. The dilution ratio and energy consumption would have been considerably decreased without any negative environmental effects on marine environment if the applied value was 38.5 psu as it has been suggested. Therefore, it is recommended to unify the salinity thresholds in the applied Spanish regulations for the protection of P. oceanica meadows based on the best available scientific evidence to avoid additional energy-economic costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据