4.7 Article

Desalination of brackish water by electrodeionization: Experimental study and mathematical modeling

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 504, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114803

关键词

Electrodeionization; Brackish water; Modeling; Nernst-Planck equation

资金

  1. CONACYT-SENER-Fondo de Sustentabilidad Energetica [292862, PIAPI2045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrodeionization (EDI) is a beneficial technology for desalination of brackish water. This paper presents an experimental study and mathematical modeling of an EDI process, analyzing the current density distribution and its impact on ion removal and performance. The model is capable of describing the effects of concentration and cell voltage changes on current density and desalination rate.
Electrodeionization (EDI) is an advantageous technology for desalination of waters with the range of salinity found in brackish water. Although modeling can help to understand the behavior of EDI cells, no reliable models connecting relevant operational variables have been published so far. Thus, this paper presents the experimental study and the mathematical modeling of an electrodeionization process used for the desalination of brackish water. The desalination process was carried out in a 4-compartment laboratory EDI cell. The model developed proposes an approach to the transport of ions in the liquid flowing in the mixed-bed resin's interstitial space. This transport is driven by the potential gradient in the liquid phase, formed by the different electric potential of cation- and anion-exchange resin particles and the Donnan potential at the interface. The model is used to analyze the current density distribution in the EDI cell and its effect on ion removal and performance to identify ineffective regions of the cell. The comparison of model calculation with experimental data shows the model to be capable of describing the effect of concentration (0.01 and 0.02 M) and cell voltage (7, 10.5 and 14 V) changes on current density and desalination rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据