4.7 Article

Resources recycle of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) wastewater 1: Effectiveness of the OF-MD hybrid system and MD process optimization

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 504, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.114953

关键词

Resource recycle; Wastewater reuse; Traditional Chinese medicines; Membrane distillation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1711300]
  2. Science and Technology Service network initiative of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-QYZX-043]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904010054]
  4. Top Young Talent program of Guangdong Pearl River Talent Plan [2019QN01G109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the OF-MD hybrid system is effective in separating and recycling valuable resources from TCM wastewater. Temperature of the feed and choice of membrane materials impact the performance of MD, with PTFE membranes being a better option for long-term operation at high temperatures.
TCM wastewater treatment is a significant environmental issue in China. This study investigated the effectiveness of the OF-MD hybrid system on recycling valuable resources in TCM wastewater. Synthetic TCM wastewater was prepared and separated with the self-assemble OF MD hybrid system. Moreover, the feed temperature (45 degrees C, 55 degrees C, 65 degrees C) and membrane materials' influence on MD performance were also evaluated. Results show that the OF MD hybrid system is efficient to achieve a complete separation and resources recycle from the TCM wastewater. The MD flux production increased with the increment of feed temperature. However, some bioactive compounds could not be concentrated in MD due to their potential degradation at high temperatures, and membrane wetting might be an issue in long-term operation. Although PP membranes exhibited the highest flux among PP, PTFE and PVDF membranes, considering the wetting and fouling resistance, PTFE membranes would be a better option for long-term MD operation at 65 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据