3.9 Article

eNOS and VEGF Variants Might Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

期刊

CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 177-182

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.3103/S0095452721020031

关键词

pancreatic cancer; eNOS; VEGF; variant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that genetic variants in eNOS and VEGF may influence the development of pancreatic cancer. The eNOS 4a/4b and 4b/4b genotypes were more prevalent in patients, while the VEGF I/D variant I/I genotype and I allele increased in the patient group. An statistically significant association was observed in the patients compared with the controls based on certain genotypes.
Background: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is essential in chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis. The association between variants in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and several cancers still remains uncertain. We studied whether there is a relation between eNOS/VEGF variants and risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Materials and Methods: This prospective case-control study included 76 PC patients (28 women and 48 men) and 100 healthy controls. Blood samples from all participants were genotyped for eNOS variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) and VEGF insertion/deletion (I/D) variants by PCR. Results: There was a significant difference between groups for the eNOS intron 4 VNTR genotype distributions (p = 0.01). eNOS 4a/4b and 4b/4b genotypes were higher in patients with PC group compared to controls while eNOS 4a/4b genotype was more prevalent in control group than in patient group. Significant differences were observed between groups for the VEGF I/D variant genotype and allele frequencies (p < 0.00, and p < 0.00). VEGF I/D variant I/I genotype and I allele increased in patient group than controls. A statistically significant association was observed when the patients were compared with the controls according to D/D + D/I versus D/D (p < 0.00, OR: 0.094, 95% CI: 0.03-0.22). Conclusions: We provided evidence that eNOS VNTR and VEGF I/D variants might influence the development of PC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据