4.5 Article

The role of water in ligand binding

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.08.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office [K123836, 2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00002, EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-0004, GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00050]
  2. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  3. Governmental Information Technology Development Agency, Hungary
  4. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology [UNKP-20-3, UNKP-20-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses recent advancements in understanding the modulatory role of water in ligand-target binding in drug design. Theoretical approaches have shown remarkable progress, providing immeasurable data and improving ligand binding through thermodynamic calculations and selection of water molecules for structural replacement. Molecular dynamics and explicit solvent models are essential for achieving precise results, and topographical analyses of hydration networks are useful for predicting the stabilizing role of interconnected water clusters mediating target-ligand interactions.
Exploration of the complex modulatory role of water in ligand- target binding is a current challenge of drug design. This review reports on recent advances of prediction of water structure and function in the context of ligand engineering. The surveyed theoretical approaches showed remarkable progress in the past years. Beyond complementing experiments, they also supplied unmeasurable data. For example, thermodynamic calculations improved ligand binding by the selection of certain water molecules for structural replacement. Molecular dynamics and explicit solvent models remained indispensable to achieve precise results. Topographical analyses of hydration networks proved useful for the prediction of the stabilizing role of interconnected water clusters mediating target-ligand interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据