4.4 Review

Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis - a past or current problem?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 307-312

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000802

关键词

ankylosing spondylitis; axial spondyloarthritis; diagnosis; diagnostic delay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) can now be diagnosed within the first months after symptom onset, diagnostic delay remains significantly high in many parts of the world. Factors such as female gender, HLA-B27 negativity, and younger age at disease onset are associated with delayed referral to a rheumatologist and larger diagnostic delay. Early referral algorithms can help identify patients with a high probability of axSpA among those with chronic back pain, and careful diagnostic evaluation with correct imaging interpretation is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis of axSpA.
Purpose of reviewTo evaluate recent data on diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), factors affecting the delay, potential ways of early diagnosis improvement, and risks associated with early diagnostic approaches.Recent findingsAlthough axSpA can be diagnosed nowadays within the first months after symptom onset, the diagnostic delay remains with several years still remarkably high in many parts of the world. Female gender, human leukocyte antigen-B27 negativity, and younger age at disease onset are among factors associated with a delayed referral to a rheumatologist and consequently with a larger diagnostic delay. Early referral algorithms are helpful in the identification of patients with a high probability of axSpA among patients with chronic back pain. A careful diagnostic evaluation with correct imaging interpretation is required to avoid misdiagnosis of axSpA in patients with unspecific back pain.SummaryThe diagnostic delay is still considerable in axSpA. The ways to early diagnosis in axSpA are well defined. Imaging findings should always be considered in the clinical context to avoid axSpA misdiagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据