4.6 Review

RNA-controlled regulation in Caulobacter crescentus

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.01.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [FR 3502/2-1, EXC 2051, 390713860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Binding proteins play a significant role in bacterial gene expression control, especially in Caulobacter where RNA chaperones and ribonucleases contribute to regulatory RNA activity. Riboswitches and RNA thermometers regulate downstream open reading frames, while small regulatory RNAs control targets through base-pairing interactions.
binding proteins constitutes an important layer of expression control in bacteria, but its principles and mechanisms in Caulobacter have only recently been explored. RNA-binding proteins including the RNA chaperone Hfq and ribonuclease RNase E contribute to the activity of regulatory RNAs. Riboswitches and RNA thermometers govern expression of downstream open reading frames, while the small regulatory RNAs CrfA, ChvR and GsrN instead control targets encoded in trans by direct base-pairing interactions. In the past decades, Caulobacter crescentus has been extensively studied, mostly regarding its dimorphic, asymmetric life cycle. Its distinct mode of reproduction and the need to optimally adapt to ever-changing environmental conditions require tight coordination of gene regulation. Post transcriptional regulation through non-coding RNAs and RNA binding proteins constitutes an important layer of expression control in bacteria, but its principles and mechanisms in Caulobacter have only recently been explored. RNA-binding proteins including the RNA chaperone Hfq and ribonuclease RNase E contribute to the activity of regulatory RNAs. Riboswitches and RNA thermometers govern expression of downstream open reading frames, while the small regulatory RNAs CrfA, ChvR and GsrN instead control targets encoded in trans by direct base-pairing interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据