4.7 Article

Uniaxial Negative Thermal Expansion in Polymorphic 2-Bromobenzophenone, Due to Aromatic Interactions?

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 2167-2175

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01603

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [FIS2017-82625-P]
  2. Catalan Government [2017SGR-42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of the metastable form II of 2-bromobenzophenone was determined by powder X-ray diffraction, revealing aromatic interactions and negative thermal expansion properties. Thermodynamic properties for both stable and metastable phases were determined, and the phase behavior under different pressure conditions was analyzed.
The structure of the metastable form II of 2-bromobenzophenone, obtained by crystallization from the melt, has been determined by powder X-ray diffraction. Form II has been solved in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P2(1)/c with a = 8.4896(19) angstrom, b = 6.5438(8) angstrom, c = 20.253(1) angstrom; beta = 104.452(6)degrees, and Z = 4 (Z' = 1) at 200 K. Both form I and form II contain a multitude of aromatic interactions, and the strength and direction of these interactions could only be interpreted with the support of the thermal-expansion tensors. Both forms exhibit, unexpectedly, uniaxial negative thermal expansion, while hydrogen bonding does not play a significant role in either of these two structures. It appears to be the first time in the literature that uniaxial negative thermal expansion may be caused by aromatic interactions. Thermodynamic properties at normal and high pressure have been determined for the stable and metastable phases, and a pressure-temperature phase diagram has been constructed. While the metastable form behaves monotropically with respect to the stable form under ambient conditions, the phase relationship becomes enantiotropic at high pressure, providing a clear example of phase behavior in which the densest form is not the most stable form under ambient conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据