4.8 Review

Control of interpenetration and structural transformations in the interpenetrated MOFs

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213789

关键词

Coordination polymers (CPs); Entanglements; Interpenetration; Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs); Single-crystal-to-single-crystal (SCSC); Structural transformation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Singapore for the Tier 1 grant through the National University of Singapore [WBS R-000-143-B13-114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article emphasizes the significance of interpenetration in metal-organic framework structures and the influence of interpenetration degree on framework properties. It also discusses the structural transformations between different degrees of interpenetration and unusual structural changes in interpenetrated MOFs with varied dimensionalities and topologies.
Interpenetration is an intriguing phenomenon in metal-organic framework (MOF) structures and considered as one of the framework isomers or supramolecular isomers. This has remarkable influence on the surface area, size and shape of the pores in MOFs. Altering the degree of interpenetration (DOI) significantly modifies the thermal stability and density of the frameworks as well as non-covalent interactions with the guest molecules and between the interpenetrated nets. As a consequence, DOI is expected to provide a greater control on the properties such as sorption of guest molecules, separation, optical properties, thermal stability, and chemical reactivity. In this focused review, we illustrated the influence of experimental conditions on the DOI with selected examples. Further, structural transformation in the solid state between different DOIs in MOFs with same topologies are discussed in detail. In addition, some unusual structural changes between different interpenetrated MOFs with varied dimensionalities and topologies are also exemplified. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据