4.5 Article

Patch testing with sodium disulfite: North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 2017 to 2018

期刊

CONTACT DERMATITIS
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 285-296

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13860

关键词

allergic contact dermatitis; CAS 7681‐ 57‐ 4; contact allergy; patch tests; sodium disulfite; sodium metabisulfite; sulfites

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective analysis focused on patients who underwent patch testing with SD, revealing a 2.7% positive reaction rate, primarily on the face and hands. Positive reactions were more common in males and those over 40 years old, often associated with personal care products and medications.
Background Sodium disulfite (SD), also known as sodium metabisulfite, is an increasingly recognized cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Objectives The objective of this work was to characterize individuals with positive patch test reactions to SD as well as analyse reaction strength, clinical relevance, and sources. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients patch tested with SD (1% petrolatum) by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG), 2017 to 2018. Results Of 4885 patients patch tested with SD, 132 (2.7%) had a positive reaction. Common primary anatomic sites of dermatitis were face (28.8%), hands (20.5%), and a scattered/generalized distribution (13.6%). Compared with SD-negative patients, SD-positive patients were more likely male (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.98-4.00) and/or over 40 years (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.30-2.94). Reactions were most commonly + (50.4%) or ++ (34.1%); 65.2% were considered currently relevant. About 15.2% were definitively confirmed in sources, commonly personal care products (18.9%, especially hair dye), and drugs/medications/alcoholic beverages (9.1%). Only 2.3% of positive reactions were linked to occupation. Conclusions Positive reactions to SD occurred in 2.7% of tested patients. Reactions were often clinically relevant and linked to personal care products and drugs/medications/alcoholic beverages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据