4.7 Article

Use of recycled coarse and fine aggregates in structural eco-concretes. Physical and mechanical properties and CO2 emissions

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122926

关键词

Coarse and fine recycled aggregates; Fresh state concrete properties; global warming potential (GWP); Concrete mechanical performance

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Interreg-POCTEP research grant [0008_ECO2CIR_4_E]
  2. Government of Extremadura
  3. ERDF [GR 18122]
  4. Regional Department of the Economy and Infrastructures of Extremadura [PD18078]
  5. [BIA2016-76643C3-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of replacing natural concrete aggregate with recycled materials, showing that incorporating recycled aggregates can enhance eco-efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions, with only a slight decrease in strength.
This study analysed the effect of simultaneously replacing 0% to 100% natural with recycled concrete coarse aggregate and natural fines with 50% recycled concrete or mixed CDW fines. Characterisation of these new secondary raw materials is followed by an analysis of the effect of their use on the fresh and hardened state properties of the resulting eco-concretes. The implications for the mechanical requirements laid down in the existing legislation are determined and proposals put forward for new expressions for calculating splitting tensile and flexural strength. The CO2 emitted (global warming potential, GWP) by the new formulations is also explored and eco-efficiency, defined as the ratio between strength and CO2 emissions, is assessed. The findings show declines of no >17% in compressive and tensile strength with these new aggregates and in flexural strength of <15%. Emissions analysis reveals that eco-efficiency is enhanced with the separate or joint use of recycled coarse and fine aggregates, due to the CO2 emissions abatement ensuing. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据