4.7 Article

Effect of sodium silicate on the properties of loess stabilized with alkali-activated fly ash-based

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122515

关键词

Sodium silicate; Geopolymers; Solidified loess; Engineering properties; Microstructure

资金

  1. Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878322]
  2. Major scientific and technological projects in Gansu Province [19ZD2FA001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lower sodium silicate modulus and higher Baume degree lead to decreased optimal moisture content, increased maximum dry density, compressive strength, and cohesion of loess solidified by alkali-activated fly ash-based geopolymers. Additionally, these conditions result in weaker disintegration, lower natural water absorption, saturated water absorption, smaller average pore diameter, larger specific surface area of pores, and larger nanoscale pore volume in the geopolymer-solidified loess.
It is a common way to prepare geopolymers by sodium silicate alkali activating fly ash. In this paper, the effects of sodium silicate with different moduli and Baume degrees on the engineering properties and microstructure of loess solidified by alkali -activated fly ash-based geopolymers were studied by unconfined compressive strength test, direct shear test, disintegration test, BET tests and water absorption test. The conclusions are as follows: As the modulus decreases and the Baume degree of sodium silicate increases, the optimal moisture content of the loess decreases, the maximum dry density, the compressive strength and cohesion increases. The lower the sodium silicate modulus and the larger the Baume degree are, the weaker the disintegration of the geopolymer-solidified loess, the lower the natural water absorption and saturated water absorption, the smaller the average pore diameter, the larger the specific surface area of pores and the larger the nanos scale pore volume are. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据