期刊
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 1850-1860出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13742
关键词
coral reef; ecosystem services; mangrove; marine coastal restoration; natural capital; restoration cost; saltmarsh; seagrass; arrecife de coral; capital natural; costo de restauracion; manglar; marisma; pastos marinos; restauracion de costas marinas; servicios ambientales
A global cost-benefit analysis shows that restoring coral reef, mangrove, saltmarsh, and seagrass ecosystems can have positive net benefits, with saltmarsh having the highest net benefits. Restoration in middle income nations yields higher net benefits compared to high income nations, and net benefit varies with restoration technique, ecosystem service produced, and project duration within an ecosystem type.
Marine coastal ecosystems, commonly referred to as blue ecosystems, provide valuable services to society but are under increasing threat worldwide due to a variety of drivers, including eutrophication, development, land-use change, land reclamation, and climate change. Ecological restoration is sometimes necessary to facilitate recovery in coastal ecosystems. Blue restoration (i.e., in marine coastal systems) is a developing field, and projects to date have been small scale and expensive, leading to the perception that restoration may not be economically viable. We conducted a global cost-benefit analysis to determine the net benefits of restoring coral reef, mangrove, saltmarsh, and seagrass ecosystems, where the benefit is defined as the monetary value of ecosystem services. We estimated costs from published restoration case studies and used an adjusted-value-transfer method to assign benefit values to these case studies. Benefit values were estimated as the monetary value provided by ecosystem services of the restored habitats. Benefits outweighed costs (i.e., there were positive net benefits) for restoration of all blue ecosystems. Mean benefit:cost ratios for ecosystem restoration were eight to 10 times higher than prior studies of coral reef and seagrass restoration, most likely due to the more recent lower cost estimates we used. Among ecosystems, saltmarsh had the greatest net benefits followed by mangrove; coral reef and seagrass ecosystems had lower net benefits. In general, restoration in nations with middle incomes had higher (eight times higher in coral reefs and 40 times higher in mangroves) net benefits than those with high incomes. Within an ecosystem type, net benefit varied with restoration technique (coral reef and saltmarsh), ecosystem service produced (mangrove and saltmarsh), and project duration (seagrass). These results challenge the perceptions of the low economic viability of blue restoration and should encourage further targeted investment in this field.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据