4.3 Article

Greater Sage-Grouse survival varies with breeding season events in West Nile virus non-outbreak years

期刊

ORNITHOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ornithapp/duab002

关键词

Culex tarsalis; Greater Sage-Grouse; mosquito; South Dakota; survival; West Nile virus; zoonotic

资金

  1. South Dakota Game, Fish, and Parks, State Wildlife grant [T-70-R-1, 2481]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Health and Air Quality Program [NNX15AF74G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Greater Sage-Grouse in South Dakota have limited exposure to West Nile virus (WNV), and WNV was not a significant driver of mortality in 2016 and 2017. The majority of sage-grouse in South Dakota are susceptible to WNV infection, suggesting a potential impact on the population during an epizootic event, however, when WNV is at or near endemic levels, it appears to have little impact on sage-grouse survival.
Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) is a species of conservation concern and is highly susceptible to mortality from West Nile virus (WNV). Culex tarsalis, a mosquito species, is the suspected primary vector for transmitting WNV to sage-grouse. We captured, radio-tagged, and monitored female sage-grouse to estimate breeding season (April 15 to September 15) survival, 2016-2017. Deceased sage-grouse were tested for active WNV; live-captured and hunterharvested sage-grouse were tested for WNV antibody titers. Additionally, we trapped mosquitoes with CO2-baited traps 4 nights per week (542 trap nights) to estimate WNV minimum infection rate (MIR). Eight sage-grouse mortalities occurred during the WNV seasons of 2016 and 2017, 5 had recoverable tissue, and 1 of 5 tested positive for WNV infection. Survival varied temporally with sage-grouse biological seasons, not WNV seasonality. Survival was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.78; n = 74) during the reproductive season (April 1 to September 15). Mammalian predators were the leading suspected cause of mortality (40%), followed by unknown cause (25%), avian predation (15%), unknown predation (15%), and WNV (5%). These results indicate WNV was not a significant driver of adult sage-grouse survival during this study. Three sage-grouse (1.9%; 95% CI: 0.5-5.9%) contained WNV antibodies. We captured 12,472 mosquitoes of which 3,933 (32%) were C. tarsalis. The estimated WNV MIR of C. tarsalis during 2016 and 2017 was 3.3 and 1.6, respectively. Our results suggest sage-grouse in South Dakota have limited exposure to WNV, and WNV was not a significant source of sagegrouse mortality in South Dakota during 2016 and 2017. Based on our finding that a majority of sage-grouse in South Dakota are susceptible to WNV infection, WNV could potentially have an impact on the population during an epizootic event; however, when WNV is at or near- endemic levels, it appears to have little impact on sage-grouse survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据