4.7 Article

A double-layer attention based adversarial network for partial transfer learning in machinery fault diagnosis

期刊

COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103399

关键词

Partial transfer learning; Mechanical fault diagnosis; Generative adversarial network; Domain adaptation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775343]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJC031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, deep transfer learning approaches have been widely developed for mechanical fault diagnosis issue. DA-GAN model shows great superiority in dealing with mechanical partial transfer problem in both TIM and TDM.
Recently, the deep transfer learning approaches have been widely developed for mechanical fault diagnosis issue, which could identify the health state of unlabeled data in the target domain with the help of knowledge learned from labeled data in the source domain. The tremendous success of these methods is generally based on the assumption that the label spaces across different domains are identical. However, the partial transfer scenario is more common for industrial applications, where the label spaces are not identical. This partial transfer scenario arises a more difficult problem that it is hard to know where to transfer since the shared label spaces are unavailable. To tackle this challenging problem, a double-layer attention based adversarial network (DA-GAN) is proposed in this paper. The proposed method sheds a new angle to deal with the question where to transfer by constructing two attention matrices for domains and samples. These attention matrices could guide the model to know which parts of data should be concentrated or ignored before conducting domain adaptation. Experimental results on both transfer in the identical machine (TIM) and transfer on different machines (TDM) suggest that the DA-GAN model shows great superiority on mechanical partial transfer problem. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据