4.5 Article

Practical constraints in the container loading problem: Comprehensive formulations and exact algorithm

期刊

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.105186

关键词

Container loading problem; Practical constraints; Integer linear programming; Constraint programming

资金

  1. Coordination for Improvement of Higher Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  2. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) [308312/2016-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the Single Container Loading Problem by proposing an exact approach that iteratively solves integer linear programming and constraint programming models. Extensive computational experiments were conducted to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach, showing that it could optimally solve instances with around ten item types and more than 70% of all instances.
This paper addresses the Single Container Loading Problem. We present an exact approach that considers the resolution of integer linear programming and constraint programming models iteratively. A linear relaxation of the problem based on packing in planes is proposed. Moreover, a comprehensive set of mathematical formulations for twelve practical constraints that arise in this problem are discussed. These constraints include complete shipment, conflicting items, priorities, weight limit, cargo stability, load-bearing, multi-drop, load-balancing, manual loading, grouping, separation, and multiple orientations. Extensive computational experiments are carried out on instances from the literature to show the performance of the proposed approach and state how each practical constraint affects the container?s occupancy, the approach runtime, and the number of packing patterns evaluated. In general, the approach could optimally solve instances with around ten items types and a total of 110 items, besides obtaining the optimal solution for more than 70% of all instances. ? 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据